The Australian Developer
MON 19.10.26CASH RATE 4.60%10-YR 5.310.03AUD US.69470.12%Newsletter

Gold Coast deputy mayor says new city plan on track for late 2027

Resistance centres on proposed height limits in several precincts, with no council vote yet scheduled on those provisions.

·2 min
Late 2027Adoption target
~14 monthsTime

On 18 October 2026, Gold Coast Deputy Mayor Mark Hammel said the city’s new City Plan remains on track for adoption in late 2027, even as resistance from a group of councillors over proposed building height limits continues, according to a post from Gold Coast Bulletin (@gcbulletin).

The City Plan is Gold Coast City Council’s statutory planning scheme under the Planning Act, setting the zoning, density and height controls that apply across the local government area. Gold Coast Bulletin’s post, as reported here, put adoption of the new plan at late 2027. No date for that adoption vote has been set, and nothing in the scheme has been adopted yet; the current City Plan stays in force until a replacement passes.

Why it matters

A council-wide City Plan rewrite differs from a single development application because the height and density controls it sets apply to every site on the Gold Coast rather than one lodgement. Where a new plan lowers or raises the height limit on a precinct, it can change what a landholding is worth and what can be built on it without a developer lodging anything. That is why councillor resistance over height settings, rather than over a single project, is the live issue here: it signals the provisions most likely to be amended, delayed or renegotiated before any adoption vote. This is a council-led process under the Planning Act, distinct from the state-run tools Economic Development Queensland applies elsewhere, such as the $2.4 billion Infrastructure Activation Fund that opened on 12 October.

Gold Coast Bulletin’s post did not identify which precincts or height bands the resistant councillors are targeting, and no council agenda, workshop paper or meeting minute was available to confirm that detail at time of writing. A missing council record does not change the fact that a dated statement was made; it does mean the specific height provisions under dispute cannot yet be verified against the primary document and are not reported here.

Until council officially lodges the draft plan for public notification, or a council resolution sets the height provisions, any late-2027 timeline is a target, not a locked date. The post did not set out the remaining approval steps.

The numbers

Late 2027 is roughly thirteen to fourteen months from Hammel’s 18 October 2026 statement, based on the calendar gap between the two dates rather than any figure stated by the outlet or the council. No other figures, such as the number of councillors opposing the height provisions, the specific height limits proposed, or the number of precincts affected, were available in the sourced material, so none are reported here.

What’s next

The next milestone for operators to watch is whichever council workshop, committee report or public notification period brings the height provisions to a vote or to public comment; none has a confirmed date yet. Until council sets that date, developers assessing Gold Coast landholdings against the new City Plan are working against a target adoption window, not a locked planning instrument, and should expect the height settings in contested precincts to be the first thing that moves if councillor resistance continues into 2027.

More: Queensland →

On the record

Also reported by
How we report →

Get tomorrow's Index

Every notable filing, deal and approval in Australian development, ranked, in one three‑minute read each morning. Free.

Your markets

Unsubscribe in one click.